
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrani.ni.ac.rs/o:2413</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-2-204-13718-8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>3373175 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">In the religious epoch of law and redemption the moral side
of human nature prevailed and outweighed the aesthetic and
cognitive side, argued Nikolai Berdyaev, the renowned Russian
religious philosopher. The Christianity of law and redemption
identifi ed religious with the moral. However, asked Berdyaev,
can the goal of sanctifi cation be reached by religious-aesthetic or
religious-cognitive perfection? Can God refuse a person for his
ugliness and want of knowledge if the person is morally perfect?
Can the person be refused because he does not create beauty or
knowledge? Can a man be saved by great accomplishments in
beauty and knowledge? For our eternal life, does God require
only the moral person, or also the aesthete and the knower? But
behind these questions there is a more fundamental dilemma:
does God need the human person? Because if he does not then
even the highest expressions of the human spirit count for little
for him who is omnipotent and omniscient. The classical concept
of the omnipotent deity allows only for one religious human
activity, and that is the prayer for redemption. But if not even
the best what we can create is good enough to exist in eternity,
what is it that is “saved” from human nature?</dc:description>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Homo Theurgos: Freedom According to John Zizioulas and Nikolai Berdyaev</dc:title>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-9198">Knežević, Romilo</dc:creator>
</oai_dc:dc>
